<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eDiscovery101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ediscovery101.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ediscovery101.net</link>
	<description>The Intersection of eDiscovery, Technology and Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='ediscovery101.net' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://ediscovery101.net/osd.xml" title="eDiscovery101" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://ediscovery101.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic Deletion…A Good Idea?</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/05/02/automatic-deletiona-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/05/02/automatic-deletiona-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defensible Disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation hold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last blog, I discussed the concept of Defensible Disposal; getting rid of data which has no value to lower the cost and risk of eDiscovery as well as overall storage costs (IBM has been a leader in Defensive Disposal for several years). Custodians keep data because they might need to reuse some of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=676&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/05/02/automatic-deletiona-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ediscovery101.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/curve1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">curve</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ediscovery101.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/folder_clock.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Folder_clock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defensible Disposal and Predictive Coding Reduces (?) eDiscovery by 65%</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/25/defensible-disposal-and-predictive-coding-reduces-ediscovery-by-65/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/25/defensible-disposal-and-predictive-coding-reduces-ediscovery-by-65/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defensible Disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/25/defensible-disposal-and-predictive-coding-reduces-ediscovery-by-65/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following Judge Peck’s decision on predictive coding in February of 2012, yet another Judge has gone in the same direction. In Global Aerospace Inc., et al, v. Landow Aviation, L.P. dba Dulles Jet Center, et al (April 23, 2012), Judge Chamblin, a state judge in the 20th Judicial Circuit of Virginia&#8217;s Loudoun Circuit Court, wrote: [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=670&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/25/defensible-disposal-and-predictive-coding-reduces-ediscovery-by-65/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>eDiscovery Cost Reduction Strategies</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/10/ediscovery-cost-reduction-strategies/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/10/ediscovery-cost-reduction-strategies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defensible deletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DuPont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/10/ediscovery-cost-reduction-strategies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In these still questionable economic times, most legal departments are still looking for ways to reduce, or at least stop the growth, of their legal budgets. One of the most obvious targets for cost reduction in any legal department is the cost of responding to eDiscovery including the cost of finding all potentially responsive ESI, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=656&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/10/ediscovery-cost-reduction-strategies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information Governance and Predictive Coding</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/07/information-governance-and-predictive-coding/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/07/information-governance-and-predictive-coding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer assisted coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predictive coding, also known as computer assisted coding and technology assisted review, all refer to the act of using computers and software applications which use machine learning algorithms to enable a computer to learn from records presented it (usually from human attorneys) as to what types of content are potentially relevant to a given legal [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=648&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/04/07/information-governance-and-predictive-coding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPIC Asks FTC to Investigate Facebook’s “Timeline”</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/11/epic-asks-ftc-to-investigate-facebooks-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/11/epic-asks-ftc-to-investigate-facebooks-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy through obscurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.wordpress.com/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year I wrote two blogs titled Spoliation of the Facebook Timeline and Frictionless eDiscovery; social media addicts beware… which discussed the potential privacy problems with the new Facebook Timeline feature. Yesterday the blog site: The ESI Ninja Blog posted a blog about further developments around privacy and the Timeline feature. The below content is from that blog: EPIC Asks [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=641&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/11/epic-asks-ftc-to-investigate-facebooks-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you wipe your twitter ramblings, and should you?</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/02/can-you-wipe-your-twitter-ramblings-and-should-you/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/02/can-you-wipe-your-twitter-ramblings-and-should-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation hold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.wordpress.com/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December of 2011, the Library of Congress and Twitter signed an agreement that will eventually make available every public Tweet ever sent as an archive to the Library of Congress. While writing a blog post last week, I began  to wonder how long all my twitter postings would be available and who could look [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=616&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2012/01/02/can-you-wipe-your-twitter-ramblings-and-should-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ediscovery101.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/twitter-1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Twitter 1</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ediscovery101.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/twitter-2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Twitter 2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who owns an employee’s social media account?</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/28/who-owns-an-employees-social-media-account/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/28/who-owns-an-employees-social-media-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/28/who-owns-an-employees-social-media-account/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times published a story on December 25th of this year  titled: “A Dispute Over Who Owns a Twitter Account Goes to Court” raising questions around the ownership of a Twitter account that was opened by an individual who included the name of the company he was working for in his account name [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=613&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/28/who-owns-an-employees-social-media-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery of Information on Personal Facebook Profile</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/06/discovery-of-information-on-personal-facebook-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/06/discovery-of-information-on-personal-facebook-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the E-Discovery Law Review Blog: A Pennsylvania court recently decided that information posted by a party on their personal Facebook page is discoverable.  Largent v. Reed, Case No. 2009-1823 (C.P. Franklin Nov. 8, 2011) arose out of a chain-reaction automobile accident in which the plaintiffs, who were riding a motorcycle, were hit by a minivan [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=608&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/06/discovery-of-information-on-personal-facebook-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge French Company Cuts off Nose to Spite Face</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/05/huge-french-company-cuts-off-nose-to-spite-face/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/05/huge-french-company-cuts-off-nose-to-spite-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susanna Kim of ABC published an article on November 29th describing how a French company has decided to implement a “Zero Email” policy, a policy banning employees from sending internal emails. The CEO of Atos, Thierry Breton, (a French information technology company!) has said that only 10 percent of the average 200 emails employees receive [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=604&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/12/05/huge-french-company-cuts-off-nose-to-spite-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Spoliation Costs Widower and His Attorney $700K in Sanctions</title>
		<link>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/11/09/facebook-spoliation-costs-widower-and-his-attorney-700k-in-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/11/09/facebook-spoliation-costs-widower-and-his-attorney-700k-in-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscovery101.net/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The below article is from Abovethelaw.com by Christopher Danzig In 2008, truck driver William Donald Sprouse pleaded guilty to charges of involuntary manslaughter for the accidental death of 25-year-old Jessica Lester. According to a bluntly-written news article from the time of the trial, Sprouse’s “truck rounded a corner on two wheels, flipped and rolled over [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ediscovery101.net&#038;blog=6969439&#038;post=601&#038;subd=ediscovery101&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscovery101.net/2011/11/09/facebook-spoliation-costs-widower-and-his-attorney-700k-in-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6ff120b064eb729506eab73efb375465?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wtolson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
